<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Architects, I am sick of your shit.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.miragestudio7.com/2007/07/dear-architects-i-am-sick-of-your-shit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.miragestudio7.com/2007/07/dear-architects-i-am-sick-of-your-shit/</link>
	<description>Architecture Tutorials 3D max Library Download AutoCAD ArchiCAD</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:47:54 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sick-of-it</title>
		<link>http://blog.miragestudio7.com/2007/07/dear-architects-i-am-sick-of-your-shit/#comment-27647</link>
		<dc:creator>Sick-of-it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.miragestudio7.com/2007/07/dear-architects-i-am-sick-of-your-shit/#comment-27647</guid>
		<description>Goober Squidly is right, but he doesn&#039;t expand on it enough.  Their ACAD skills are worse than those of a boiled turnip.

Architects always assume they never make a mistake and the rest of the dumb masses can&#039;t tie shoes w/o help...Yet if you ask a question, they cannot answer it: Specs, Plan View, and Elevation View do not agree.  What should I do?
Answer: Bid and build according to plans and specs!

And how is it we have to send in RFIs and allow two weeks for a response, if we EVER get one, but we have to respond to requests from them in 7 nano-seconds?

Why do they play &quot;Where&#039;s Waldo?&quot; with info and details on the prints?  Can&#039;t put all the info in the dwg pkg?  and then tell you it&#039;s your fault that you didn&#039;t know thus and such, but you never got an answer to your RFI &#039;cuz you sent it in too close to the cut-off date. 

Not to mention that they never have details that actually look like how it is really built.  They hang stuff in the air w/o support (sky hooks?) They spec stuff via some boiler plate crap that was written in 1947 or before and want you to stick to it even if it doesn&#039;t work...Sorry, I&#039;m getting crazed.

Architects and their shoddy work cost their clients money.  They should be avoided like a rash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goober Squidly is right, but he doesn&#8217;t expand on it enough.  Their ACAD skills are worse than those of a boiled turnip.</p>
<p>Architects always assume they never make a mistake and the rest of the dumb masses can&#8217;t tie shoes w/o help&#8230;Yet if you ask a question, they cannot answer it: Specs, Plan View, and Elevation View do not agree.  What should I do?<br />
Answer: Bid and build according to plans and specs!</p>
<p>And how is it we have to send in RFIs and allow two weeks for a response, if we EVER get one, but we have to respond to requests from them in 7 nano-seconds?</p>
<p>Why do they play &#8220;Where&#8217;s Waldo?&#8221; with info and details on the prints?  Can&#8217;t put all the info in the dwg pkg?  and then tell you it&#8217;s your fault that you didn&#8217;t know thus and such, but you never got an answer to your RFI &#8216;cuz you sent it in too close to the cut-off date. </p>
<p>Not to mention that they never have details that actually look like how it is really built.  They hang stuff in the air w/o support (sky hooks?) They spec stuff via some boiler plate crap that was written in 1947 or before and want you to stick to it even if it doesn&#8217;t work&#8230;Sorry, I&#8217;m getting crazed.</p>
<p>Architects and their shoddy work cost their clients money.  They should be avoided like a rash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arq.fab</title>
		<link>http://blog.miragestudio7.com/2007/07/dear-architects-i-am-sick-of-your-shit/#comment-27641</link>
		<dc:creator>arq.fab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.miragestudio7.com/2007/07/dear-architects-i-am-sick-of-your-shit/#comment-27641</guid>
		<description>...at some points annie choi is right about us, but much of the time, she overreacted...

saifullah....LUV YA!

goober squidly...get a F#%^)^#@! life..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;at some points annie choi is right about us, but much of the time, she overreacted&#8230;</p>
<p>saifullah&#8230;.LUV YA!</p>
<p>goober squidly&#8230;get a F#%^)^#@! life..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
