Architecture + Humor
Weird Job Vacancy Ad
Worst 3D perspective Ever
Pimp My Model
Separated at Birth
Dilbert Cad Monkey
Frank Gehry & Simpsons
Presentation Crits
Architecture + Life
Forbidden Architecture
Iconography & Form Making
Architects & Prostitutes
Technology in Architecture
Architecture Illusion
Democratic Achitecture
Automobile Home
We Shape Our Buildings and Afterwards, Our Buildings Shape Us
4 December 2007 | Category: Architecture Debates

What did you see? What is above the woman’s head? What element is the backdrop? Researchers showed an identical image to people from East Africa, almost all of those took part in the experiment said the lady was balancing a box on her head, in an African culture where there are few angular visual cues, the group of people is seen sitting under a big tree. On the other hand, Westerners are used to corners and rectangular architecture, thus they are more likely to visualize the group of people in an indoor space and to interpret the rectangular shape above the lady’s head as a window opening.
The studies showed the influence of different culture and environment can have an effect on our visual perception, this theory was first explored by Robert Laws, a Scottish missionary working in Malawi, Africa, during the late 1800’s.
Winston Churchill’s epic statement, “We shape our buildings and afterwards, our buildings shape us,” is a fantastic observation of the architectural phenomenon, illuminating the fact that physical architecture is a static artifact and continues to transform us long after construction.

Couple with Churchill’s famous quotes and the illusion above, does a person who comes from a third world has the same creativity in architecture compare to someone whom was brought up in a historically rich city such as Paris?

This reminds me of a conversation I had with my friend (not an architecture student) last year, we were arguing about the use of Roman / Doric columns in most of the houses in Malaysia, a typical Malaysian trend where these columns are an essential element in every houses, an eye sore. Not only the use of these mini Doric columns are ugly, he was defending the overall design as well, saying it is beautiful.
It is hard to convince them that these houses are tasty for the tasteless.
Technorati Tags: Winston Churchill, Robert Laws, Optical Illusion, Illusion, Malaysian, Malaysia, Terrace House, Houses
We Recommend
Stories you may be interested in based on the article above
3 Comments
Leave a Reply



cthulhu
on December 11th, 2007Roman / Doric columns ARE an eye sore. Especially when they coupled with wooden houses. It’s like living in an architectural birth defect.
Jonathan Gross
on February 14th, 2008To you they may be anachronistic architectural elements, but to someone from Malaysia, they could be stand-ins for trees–very important in creating a sense of safety.
Shi Ying
on February 26th, 2008Not to forget, to the ‘tasteless’ the diameter of each of the columns are equivalent to their belly size, thus, reflecting how rich they are. That’s why my friend admitted her dad needs 6 roman columns in their driveway.