Frank Gehry’s Design Keeps Buildings Off Budget

Image Copyright: Fox Broadcasting Company
The title says ‘Frank Gehry’s Software Keeps Buildings on Budget’; somehow I think the title should be ‘Frank Gehry’s design keeps buildings off budget’. First he proposed a problem (off budget), and now he is selling a solution to his own problem? Am I missing something?
Tags: Frank Gehry, Frank Gehry Architect, frank gehry architecture, Frank Gehry Design, frank gehry walt disney concert hall, Gehry TechnologyMr. Gehry developed the software, now called Digital Project, to produce a sculpture of a diaphanous fish for a Barcelona exposition in 1992 and refined it to specify the titanium panels cloaking his celebrated Guggenheim Museum Bilbao, which opened in 1997. He based it on the three-dimensional software that aerospace companies use. “If they can build airplanes paperless, I think buildings can be built paperless,” Mr. Gehry said.
In 2002, he spun off the software business into a company called Gehry Technologies, which sells Digital Project to other developers and architects and trains project teams to use it.
Digital Project works by modeling, in three dimensions, every odd shape an architect envisions and then letting engineers and architects reconcile the shape with a building’s site, ductwork and other features. It shows how one change to a building’s ingredients changes all the others. Source: NYTimes
Related Articles
Similar posts you may be interested in based on past browsing
Walt Disney Concert Hall Los Angeles Lawsuit Settled

That was close Mr.Frank Gehry.
That deal was reached last year, but took another year to finalize between attorneys for the 18 litigants involved in the case. Disney Concert Hall will pay $13.3 million to contractors from building and donor funds.
“The structure, home of the Los Angeles Philharmonic, opened six years late and more than $174 million over budget. The building’s final cost, including monies paid out in this most recent settlement, total in the vicinity of $284 million.” – ArchitectureMag
“Although Gehry’s firm was not a party in the suit, the builders criticized the architect’s work—including a leaky skylight and problems with the cooling system—during court proceedings. Gehry’s insurance policy became a part of the settlement because the Disney Hall corporation was included in its coverage.” – Los Angeles Times
Related Articles
Similar posts you may be interested in based on past browsing


